Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silas Birtwistle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a consensus that the subject meets the WP:GNG, therefore whether or not he meets WP:NARTIST is irrelevant. – Joe (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Silas Birtwistle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot see... or find... anything to suggest that this individual passes WP:ARTIST TheLongTone (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He's not notable in the traditional sense for artists. However he got some good press in RS for his "environmental works". Here's one in the Telegraph. Another in ArtDaily, and a blurb on "The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)".104.163.150.32 (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's not passing WP:ARTIST, as it usually a problem with environmentalists, unless it's Vik Muniz, but with references provided above, he can pass WP:GNG. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added references to United Nations COP conferences where Silas Birtwistle has exhibited work--Roylej (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.